National Insecurity
Dear Mr. Bush:
I'm sorry for the informality of calling you Mr. Bush, as opposed to President Bush, but after this week's announcement of a 6-port deal with Dubai, I don't really feel you're worthy of the title anymore. Actually, I've felt that way for a while, but I was raised the old-fashioned way and continued to call you President out of respect (what respect, I don't know, but it sounds good).
I walked in from work two evenings ago and heard on the news that you and your administration have agreed to a deal that would allow the sale of 6 of our most important and busiest ports to United Arab Emirates (aka the Dubai Dynasty). My husband (a former cadet at West Point) and my grandfather (a WWII Navy veteran and a decorated former US Army civilian employee) were both raving at the absolutely insane and ridiculous news report. It couldn't possibly be true. And yet, you've thrown us all for a loop again.
My family and I live in New Jersey, about 50 miles south of NYC (we like to call it "down the shore"). As an employee of an NYC firm, I pass the ports everyday. I used to marvel at the shipments and the size of the cargo carriers. I used to think it was fascinating that this was all happening in my back yard. Like it's not already difficult enough to sleep on the bus next to a snoring, obnoxious cell-phone talking, "who the hell gave you the right to sit next to me" commuter (fun, ain't it?). Now I can ride past the ports and pray to God I'm not blown up.
What's even worse is that we have a Naval Weapons station not to far away. Come to think about it, most of those ports are near some sort of military base (NYC/NJ--Earle Naval Weapons Station; Miami--Homestead Air Force Base; Baltimore--Maryland Air National Guard and not too far from Annapolis Naval Station; oh right, and Washington, DC--need I say more?). So for those of us in these port areas, it's pretty much a potential double whammy. Not cool.
And now that the whole country and government is in an uproar (thank you Republicans for seeing the light!), you tell us that you had no idea the agreement was made by your administration. Yeah, right. Try that one again. For all of the lies you've given us so far, I'd think you'd be able to come up with something better than "I didn't know" (that didn't work for me in 2nd grade, and it's not going to work for you now). But wait! You were so quick to defend the plan before you revealed you had no idea about it, so my deductive reasoning leads me to believe that you did, in fact, know about this from the beginning. Oh right, and your administration's and family's ties to Dubai probably had nothing to do with it, right?
Granted, maybe this whole thing looked good on paper (crayon scribbles don't count W), but when you commit to something you know is going to have an adverse affect on national security, no matter how secure they promise it's going to be, it's not a good idea. As Captain James T. Kirk of the Starship Enterprise once said (quoting the Kobayashi Maru), "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few." The last time I checked the census bureau's website, there were 298,169,913 in the United States. Who do you think is more important, one Arab company, your wallet or 298,169,913 people who depend on the guidance of their federal government? The answer is obvious to me, but hey, what do I know? It' s not like I'm President or anything!
And this really gets me: Though Dubai agrees to aid in anti-terrorism and US Homeland Security, they don't have to keep records of their dealings United States soil. Wait, let me read that again. Right, once more: they don't have to keep records of their dealings on United States soil. That smells a little fishy to me. And yet you're wondering why we weren't concerned about a British company running port operations. Here's a little lesson for you: Ever since we kicked Britain's ass in the American Revolution (when we fought for OUR freedom), they have been great, trustworthy allies, always there to back us up, no matter how stupid your ideas are (need I mention the "war on terror"). I may not like Tony Blair that much, but I'm starting to respect him far more than I ever have you (that was a tough one to get out).
Oh right, and Dubai has paid off terrorists to keep their dynasty from being overthrown. Shouldn't they be on trial with Saddam for giving terrorists money? So who's to say the terrorists won't get in? We know they're there and they're being paid very well. Imagine how much they and their families would be paid to conceal their identities and run through the streets of New York as car bombers and suicide bombers. Just a thought, but I guess there's no more timing for thinking (was there ever?).
Oh well. It's not like you can do anything about it now. If you back out that would make the US look like racists or perhaps give the world the impression we're biased against Arabs. Talk about a catch-22: either we let them in or they'll force their way in. Oh, GW, what wonder you've done for this country. What's you're approval rating again? 39, maybe 40%. Keep it up GW. Somewhere, far, far away in the swamps of Florida, someone's counting on you. Oh wait, that's only Jeb!
Sincerely,
Mad Ann Flint
Pirate Princess
